CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 22-00147 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 22-00147

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date9/21/2023
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Related decisionSee the appeal decision (Case 22-00147) →
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Carol G. Ricciardello
Government Counsel: Jenny G. Bayer
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 29-year-old individual who sought a security clearance and faced allegations under Guideline E (personal conduct) and Guideline F (financial considerations). The Statement of Reasons (SOR) outlined concerns primarily related to the applicant's failure to disclose delinquent student loans totaling approximately $55,904 and a small debt of $48. The applicant admitted to the allegations but contended that he did not intentionally omit the information, believing that the financial questions on the security clearance application pertained only to certain types of debts.
During the hearing, the applicant acknowledged his financial difficulties and admitted to making only one payment toward his student loans prior to the SOR. He expressed confusion regarding the nature of his debts and indicated that he had not sought further assistance or clarification about his financial obligations. The administrative judge found the applicant credible in his belief that he did not need to disclose the student loans but determined that he failed to mitigate the financial concerns. Consequently, the judge ruled against the applicant, denying eligibility for access to classified information based on the unresolved financial issues, which raised questions about his reliability and trustworthiness.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline EPersonal Conduct · For Applicant
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 22-00147

deniedSep 21, 2023· Hon. Carol G. Ricciardello· hearing

Summary

A 29-year-old applicant with a bachelor's degree was denied a security clearance under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The denial primarily stemmed from approximately $55,904 in delinquent student loans, which were detailed in the Statement of Reasons (SOR) across paragraphs 1.a through 1.j. The SOR also alleged a small, $48 debt in paragraph 1.k, of which the applicant claimed unawareness.

Under personal conduct, the applicant refuted allegations that he deliberately failed to disclose his delinquent student loans and the other debt. However, the decision highlighted his failure to demonstrate sufficient mitigation of his financial problems. Disqualifying conditions under AG ¶ 19(a) and AG ¶ 19(c) were raised.

The denial was ultimately based on the applicant's failure to mitigate the financial concerns. He did not take proactive measures to resolve his debts or seek financial counseling, and his perceived naivety regarding his financial obligations raised significant concerns about his reliability and judgment.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant failed to mitigate financial concerns related to delinquent student loans totaling approximately $55,904.
He did not take proactive measures to resolve his debts or seek financial counseling.
His naivety regarding his financial obligations raised significant concerns about his reliability and judgment.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(a)appliedInability to Satisfy Debts
AG ¶ 19(c)appliedHistory of Not Meeting Financial Obligations

Key Rule Quoted

“Any doubt concerning personnel being considered for national security eligibility will be resolved in favor of the national security.”
— AG ¶ 2(b)

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedJul 20, 2021
Answer filedAug 19, 2022
Hearing heldAug 23, 2023via Microsoft Teams
Decision dateSep 21, 2023

Cite For

Failure to Mitigate Financial Obligations Under Guideline F
Naivety Regarding Financial Responsibilities Impacting Judgment
Denial of Security Clearance Due to Unresolved Debts

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline E (Personal Conduct) · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: denied

The judge found that the applicant did not deliberately fail to disclose his delinquent student loans. The applicant admitted to the allegations but was found credible in his belief that he did not need to report the loans. The outcome was denied, indicating unresolved personal conduct concerns.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Conduct	Concealed Issue	Response	Disqualifying (¶16)	Mitigating applied (¶17)	Mitigation
2.a	Applicant refuted the security concerns under personal conduct.	For Applicant	Unspecified Personal Conduct	—	Admitted	—	—	—
2.b	specific text not stated in this decision	For Applicant	Unspecified Personal Conduct	—	Unknown	—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline E). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: denied

The judge found against the applicant on all financial allegations under Guideline F, primarily concerning delinquent student loans totaling approximately $55,904 and a small debt of $48. The applicant admitted to the allegations but failed to demonstrate effective mitigation of the financial concerns raised.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	The SOR alleges Applicant deliberately failed to disclose his delinquent student loans and another debt. $55,904	Against Applicant	Student Loan Debt	Admitted	—	—	Claimed Other
1.b	The student loans are alleged in SOR ¶¶ 1.a through 1.j and total approximately $55,904. $55,904	Against Applicant	Student Loan Debt	Admitted	—	—	Claimed Other
1.k	The SOR alleges a small debt (¶ 1.k - $48) that Applicant said he was unaware of. $48	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	—	—	Claimed Other
1.c–1.l	9 sub-charges — specific text not stated in this decision (against the applicant). (low confidence)	Against Applicant			—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.