CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 22-01323 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 22-01323

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date3/22/2023
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Related decisionsSee the hearing decision (Case 22-01323) →See the appeal decision (Case 22-01323) →
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Braden M. Murphy
Government Counsel: Rhett E. Petcher
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 33-year-old individual who applied for a security clearance on August 24, 2021. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) on July 20, 2022, citing security concerns under Guideline F (financial considerations) and Guideline E (personal conduct). The core allegations included approximately $52,000 in delinquent debts, including federal student loans and income taxes, and the applicant's failure to disclose these debts on his security clearance application.
In his response to the SOR, the applicant admitted to several debts but denied others, asserting that he was unaware of some debts being in collections. He provided explanations for his financial difficulties, including attempts to rehabilitate his student loans and a claim that he had been misinformed about his tax obligations. The applicant also submitted documentation regarding his financial situation, including an income-based repayment plan for his student loans and communications with his tax preparer regarding his tax status.
The administrative judge ruled against the applicant, concluding that he did not provide sufficient evidence to mitigate the financial concerns. While the judge found that the personal conduct allegations regarding intentional falsification were not established, the overall financial issues raised significant concerns about the applicant's reliability and trustworthiness. Consequently, the applicant's eligibility for access to classified information was denied.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline EPersonal Conduct · For Applicant
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 22-01323

deniedMar 22, 2023· Hon. Braden M. Murphy· hearing

Summary

A 33-year-old defense contractor was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The primary issue involved approximately $52,000 in delinquent debts, including federal student loans and income taxes. Specific allegations included a $700 debt to a phone company, a $1,164 debt to a bank, a $367 debt to a jeweler, and $20,000 in past-due federal income taxes for tax year 2019. Additionally, the applicant did not disclose any delinquent debts on his August 2021 Security Clearance Application.

While the judge found no deliberate omission of financial delinquencies on the application, the overall financial irresponsibility raised significant concerns about the applicant's reliability and trustworthiness. Disqualifying conditions were raised under Adjudicative Guidelines 19(a), 19(c), and 19(f).

The denial was based on the applicant's failure to provide sufficient evidence to mitigate the financial concerns. His federal student loans remained in default, and his past-due federal income taxes were unresolved. The applicant did not demonstrate a good-faith effort to repay overdue creditors or otherwise resolve his debts.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence to mitigate financial concerns arising from delinquent debts totaling approximately $52,000.
The applicant's federal student loans remained in default status and he had not resolved his past-due federal income taxes.
The applicant did not demonstrate a good-faith effort to repay overdue creditors or otherwise resolve debts.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(a)raisedInability to Satisfy Debts
AG ¶ 19(c)raisedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
AG ¶ 19(f)raisedFailure to File or Pay Taxes as Required

Key Rule Quoted

“The clearly consistent standard indicates that security determinations should err, if they must, on the side of denials.”
— Department of the Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518, 531 (1988)

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedJul 20, 2022
Answer filedJul 21, 2022
Hearing held—Applicant elected to have the case decided on the written record.
Decision dateMar 22, 2023

Cite For

Insufficient Evidence to Mitigate Financial Concerns Under Guideline F
Failure to Demonstrate Good-faith Efforts to Resolve Debts
Non-deliberate Omission of Financial Delinquencies on Security Clearance Application Under Guideline E

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline E (Personal Conduct) · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: Decision on RecordDecided: denied

The judge found that the applicant did not deliberately fail to disclose his financial delinquencies on his security clearance application. The allegations under Guideline E were resolved in favor of the applicant, indicating that the concerns regarding personal conduct were mitigated.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Conduct	Concealed Issue	Response	Disqualifying (¶16)	Mitigating applied (¶17)	Mitigation
2.a	Applicant did not disclose any delinquent debts on his August 2021 SCA.	For Applicant	Omission or Failure to DiscloseNOT DELIBERATE	Financial	Denied	—	(a) prompt, good-faith correction before being confronted	—
2.b	specific text not stated in this decision	For Applicant	Unspecified Personal Conduct	—	Unknown	—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline E). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: Decision on RecordDecided: denied

The judge found that the applicant has significant financial concerns, including approximately $52,000 in delinquent debts, primarily consisting of federal student loans and income taxes. The judge ruled against the applicant on all allegations under Guideline F, indicating that the debts remain unresolved and continue to raise concerns about the applicant's judgment and reliability.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant has delinquent debts totaling about $52,000, including federal student loans and income taxes. $52,000	Against Applicant	Student Loan Debt	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—
1.b–1.h	7 sub-charges — specific text not stated in this decision (against the applicant). (low confidence)	Against Applicant			—	—	—
1.i	SOR ¶ 1.i ($700) is an account placed for collection by a phone company. $700	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Denied	—	—	—
1.j	specific text not stated in this decision	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	—	—	—
1.k	SOR ¶ 1.k ($1,164) is an account placed for collection by a bank. $1,164	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Denied	—	—	—
1.l	SOR ¶ 1.l ($367) is an account placed for collection by a jeweler. $367	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Denied	—	—	—
1.m	SOR ¶ 1.m ($20,000) concerns Applicant’s past-due federal income taxes for tax year (TY) 2019. $20,000	Against Applicant	Tax Unpaid	Admitted	—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.