CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 22-02047 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 22-02047

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date9/15/2023
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Richard A. Cefola
Government Counsel: Andrew H. Henderson
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 69-year-old employee of a defense contractor, who had been employed since July 2020 and was a retired U.S. Army veteran. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing security concerns under Guidelines F (Financial Considerations) and E (Personal Conduct). The core allegations included the applicant's failure to satisfy multiple past-due debts totaling approximately $44,962, which he attributed to a failed business.
During the proceedings, the applicant admitted to the debts but argued they were business-related rather than personal. He did not provide additional documentation to support his claims or to address the debts. The administrative judge found that the applicant's financial difficulties were ongoing and that he had not taken steps to resolve them, which did not mitigate the security concerns under Guideline F. However, the judge determined that the applicant's mischaracterization of his debts was not deliberate, leading to a favorable finding under Guideline E.
Ultimately, the administrative judge ruled against the applicant on the financial considerations, citing insufficient evidence to mitigate the concerns, while finding in favor of the applicant regarding personal conduct. The decision reflected a comprehensive evaluation of the applicant's circumstances and the potential risks associated with granting a security clearance.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline EPersonal Conduct · For Applicant
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 22-02047

deniedSep 15, 2023· Hon. Richard A. Cefola· hearing

Summary

A 69-year-old retired U.S. Army member and defense contractor was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The applicant had approximately $44,962 in past-due debts, which included $24,603 owed to Creditor A, $11,881 to Creditor B, and $8,478 to Creditor C. These debts were attributed to a failed business.

While the judge found in favor of the applicant under Guideline E (Personal Conduct), determining that his misunderstanding of the debts was not deliberate, the financial issues remained a significant concern. The applicant acknowledged these debts as personal obligations.

Ultimately, the clearance was denied because the applicant failed to demonstrate that future financial problems were unlikely or that he had taken sufficient steps to address the delinquencies.

Why the Applicant Prevailed

The judge found the applicant's misunderstanding of his debts was not deliberate.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(a)raisedInability to Satisfy Debts
AG ¶ 19(b)raisedUnwillingness to Satisfy Debts Regardless of the Ability to Do So
AG ¶ 19(c)raisedHistory of Not Meeting Financial Obligations

Mitigating

AG ¶ 20(b)rejectedConditions That Resulted in the Financial Problem Were Largely Beyond the Person's ControlThe applicant's financial problems were ongoing and he did not demonstrate responsible action to address them.

Key Rule Quoted

“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedNov 7, 2022
Answer filedJan 11, 2023
Hearing heldJun 1, 2023The record was left open until July 28, 2023.
Decision dateSep 15, 2023

Cite For

Financial Considerations Under Guideline F
Personal Conduct Under Guideline E
Ongoing Financial Issues Impacting Security Clearance Eligibility

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: denied

The judge found against the applicant on all financial allegations under Guideline F, citing significant past-due debts totaling over $43,000. The applicant admitted to these debts but attributed his financial difficulties to a failed business, which the judge did not find sufficient to mitigate the security concerns.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
2.a	Applicant admits a past-due debt to Creditor A in the amount of about $24,603. $24,603	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	—	—	Claimed Other
2.b	Applicant admits a past-due debt to Creditor B in the amount of about $11,881. $11,881	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	—	—	Claimed Other
2.c	Applicant admits a past-due debt to Creditor C in the amount of about $8,478. $8,478	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	—	—	Claimed Other

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.