CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 21-01882 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 21-01882

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date2/6/2024
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Related decisionSee the appeal decision (Case 21-01882) →
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Mark W. Harvey
Government Counsel: Carroll J. Connelly
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 51-year-old aircraft mechanic who had served in the Navy for 20 years and was seeking a security clearance. The adjudicative guidelines at issue included Guidelines K (handling protected information), B (foreign influence), I (psychological conditions), and E (personal conduct). The Statement of Reasons (SOR) outlined concerns regarding the applicant's undisclosed marriage to a Peruvian national, his mental health history, and his failure to disclose certain incidents during his military service.
The applicant admitted to several allegations in the SOR, including his marriage to a foreign national and certain mental health issues, while denying others related to his conduct and disclosures. He provided some mitigating information regarding his mental health treatment and claimed that his past behavior was not indicative of his current state. However, the administrative judge noted a pattern of rule-violating behavior and poor judgment, particularly in relation to his failure to disclose significant information about his personal life and mental health history.
Ultimately, the administrative judge ruled that security concerns under Guidelines K, B, and I were mitigated, but those under Guideline E were not. The judge concluded that the applicant's history of dishonesty and failure to disclose critical information raised significant trustworthiness concerns, leading to the denial of his eligibility for access to classified information.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline BForeign Influence · For Applicant
- Guideline EPersonal Conduct · Against Applicant
- Guideline IPsychological Conditions · For Applicant
- Guideline KHandling Protected Information · For Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 21-01882

deniedFeb 6, 2024· Hon. Mark W. Harvey· hearing

Summary

A 51-year-old aircraft mechanic and Navy veteran was denied a security clearance due to unmitigated personal conduct concerns. The denial primarily stemmed from the applicant's repeated failure to disclose his marriage to a foreign national, which raised significant trustworthiness issues. This pattern of dishonesty and poor judgment undermined his reliability for access to classified information, with his untruthfulness during the security clearance process being a critical factor.

While the applicant presented mitigating factors under Guideline B (Foreign Influence), Guideline I (Psychological Conditions), and Guideline K (Handling Protected Information), these were insufficient to overcome the serious concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct). Disqualifying conditions under AG ¶ 16(a) and AG ¶ 16(b) were raised, despite mitigating conditions applied under AG ¶ 33, AG ¶ 8, and AG ¶ 29.

Ultimately, the applicant's demonstrated pattern of dishonesty regarding his marriage and other personal conduct issues led to the conclusion that he does not meet the standards for access to classified information.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant repeatedly failed to disclose his marriage to a foreign national, which raised significant trustworthiness concerns.
The applicant demonstrated a pattern of dishonesty and poor judgment, undermining his reliability for access to classified information.
The applicant's failure to provide truthful information during the security clearance process was a critical factor in the denial.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 16(a)appliedDeliberate Omission, Concealment, or Falsification of Relevant Facts
AG ¶ 16(b)appliedDeliberately Providing False or Misleading Information

Mitigating

AG ¶ 33appliedHandling Protected Information
AG ¶ 8appliedForeign Influence
AG ¶ 29appliedPsychological Conditions

Key Rule Quoted

“"Any doubt concerning personnel being considered for access to classified information will be resolved in favor of the national security."”
— Egan, 484 U.S. at 531

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedJun 15, 2023
Answer filedJul 4, 2023
Hearing heldNov 16, 2023
Decision dateFeb 6, 2024

Cite For

Denial of Security Clearance Due to Dishonesty Under Guideline E
Impact of Personal Conduct on Security Clearance Eligibility
Mitigation of Foreign Influence Concerns Under Guideline B

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.