CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 23-00563 — CASE

DOHA Record Explorer

ISCR Case 23-00563

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date3/19/2024
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Related decisionSee the appeal decision (Case ISCR Case No. 23-00563) →
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Candace Le'i Garcia
Government Counsel: Nicholas T. Temple
Case Summary
The applicant in this case sought a security clearance and faced allegations primarily under Guideline F (financial considerations) and Guideline E (personal conduct). The Statement of Reasons (SOR) outlined concerns regarding the applicant's significant delinquent debts, including federal and state taxes, as well as various consumer debts. Additionally, the applicant was terminated from a previous job for improperly disposing of company IT equipment without notifying his employer.
During the proceedings, the applicant admitted to the allegations regarding his financial issues and the personal conduct incident. He attributed his financial difficulties to periods of unemployment and acknowledged poor financial management. The applicant provided evidence of efforts to address his debts, including entering into installment agreements with tax authorities and making payments toward some debts. However, he did not fully mitigate the financial concerns, as he had a history of delinquent debts and ongoing financial obligations.
The administrative judge ruled against the applicant, denying eligibility for access to classified information. The judge concluded that while the applicant had mitigated some personal conduct concerns, the financial considerations remained unresolved. The judge emphasized the applicant's ongoing financial issues and the lack of a comprehensive plan to address his debts, which raised concerns about his reliability and judgment.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline EPersonal Conduct · For Applicant
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 23-00563

deniedMar 19, 2024· Hon. Candace Le'i Garcia· hearing

Summary

A 34-year-old male applicant was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The Statement of Reasons detailed allegations including termination from employment for improper disposal of company IT equipment, and significant delinquent debts. These debts comprised $1,744 in federal income taxes, $8,991 in state income taxes, nine consumer debts totaling $40,796, and three medical debts amounting to $943.

While the applicant successfully mitigated the personal conduct concern related to the improper disposal of company equipment, the financial concerns remained unresolved. The judge found that the applicant failed to adequately address or resolve approximately $50,000 in delinquent debts.

Ultimately, the judge concluded that the applicant's substantial and unmitigated financial issues raised doubts about his reliability and trustworthiness, leading to the denial of his security clearance.

Why the Applicant Prevailed

The applicant mitigated the personal conduct security concern by acknowledging his lapse in judgment and demonstrating understanding of the importance of following rules.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(a)raisedInability to Satisfy Debts
AG ¶ 19(c)raisedHistory of Not Meeting Financial Obligations

Mitigating

AG ¶ 20(b)appliedConditions Beyond the Individual's Control Contributed to the Financial ProblemsThe applicant's financial issues were exacerbated by periods of unemployment.
AG ¶ 20(d)appliedGood-faith Effort to Repay Overdue CreditorsThe applicant made payments on some debts and entered into payment agreements.

Key Rule Quoted

“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedMar 22, 2023
Answer filedApr 4, 2023
Hearing heldDec 12, 2023Hearing was convened as scheduled.
Decision dateMar 19, 2024

Cite For

Mitigation of Personal Conduct Under Guideline E
Financial Considerations Under Guideline F
Impact of Delinquent Debts on Security Clearance Eligibility

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline E (Personal Conduct) · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: denied

The judge found that the applicant was terminated from his employment for improperly disposing of company IT equipment. Although the applicant admitted to the conduct, the judge concluded that it was not consistent with the national interest to grant the applicant eligibility for a security clearance.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Conduct	Concealed Issue	Response	Disqualifying (¶16)	Mitigating applied (¶17)	Mitigation
2.a	Applicant was terminated from his employment for improperly disposing of company IT equipment.	For Applicant	Rules Violation at Workplace	—	Admitted	—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline E). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: denied

The judge found multiple financial concerns under Guideline F, including delinquent federal and state income taxes, numerous consumer debts, and medical debts. Ultimately, the judge ruled against the applicant on these allegations, concluding that the applicant's financial issues raised significant security concerns.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant owes $1,744 in delinquent federal income taxes. $1,744	Against Applicant	Tax Unpaid	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—
1.b	Applicant owes $8,991 in delinquent state income taxes. $8,991	Against Applicant	Tax Unpaid	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—
1.c	Applicant has nine delinquent consumer debts totaling $40,796. $40,796	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—
1.f	Applicant has three delinquent medical debts totaling $943. $943	Against Applicant	Medical Debt	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—
1.d–1.n	10 sub-charges — specific text not stated in this decision (5 against, 5 for the applicant). (low confidence)	Mixed			—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.