CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 23-02065 — CASE

DOHA Record Explorer

ISCR Case 23-02065

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date8/16/2024
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Edward W. Loughran
Government Counsel: David F. Hayes
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 34-year-old employee of a defense contractor, applying for a security clearance for the first time. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing security concerns under Guidelines E (personal conduct) and H (drug involvement and substance misuse). The core allegations included the applicant's history of illegal drug use, primarily marijuana, and his expressed intent to continue using it despite knowing it was illegal.
The applicant admitted to a history of marijuana use since 2006, including a 2007 arrest for possession of MDMA and a positive drug test in 2008. He disclosed this history in his security clearance application and indicated that he intended to use marijuana in the future. Although he claimed to have stopped using marijuana in August 2023, he did not provide any evidence of actions taken to mitigate his drug use or establish a pattern of abstinence. The applicant did not respond to the Government's formal request for additional information.
The administrative judge ruled against the applicant, concluding that he did not mitigate the security concerns related to his drug involvement and personal conduct. The judge noted that the applicant's illegal drug use was recent and ongoing, which raised significant questions about his reliability and trustworthiness. The judge emphasized that none of the mitigating conditions applied, and the applicant's acknowledgment of his drug use did not sufficiently demonstrate a commitment to abstain from future use. Consequently, the applicant's eligibility for access to classified information was denied.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline EPersonal Conduct · Against Applicant
- Guideline HDrug Involvement & Substance Misuse · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 23-02065

deniedAug 16, 2024· Hon. Edward W. Loughran· hearing

Summary

A 34-year-old defense contractor was denied a security clearance under Guidelines E (Personal Conduct) and H (Drug Involvement). The denial stemmed from the applicant's history of illegal drug use, primarily marijuana, which began in 2006, and an expressed intent to continue using marijuana in the future.

Further concerns were raised by the applicant's ongoing association with relatives and friends involved in illegal drug activities. The administrative judge determined that these factors, coupled with the applicant's failure to mitigate the identified security concerns, rendered the individual ineligible for access to classified information.

Specifically, the disqualifying conditions cited included the history of illegal drug use, the stated intent to continue such use, and the continued association with individuals engaged in illegal drug activities. The judge concluded that these issues were not adequately resolved, leading to the denial of the security clearance.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant has a history of illegal drug use, primarily marijuana, since 2006.
The applicant expressed intent to continue using marijuana in the future.
The applicant associates with individuals involved in illegal drug activities.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 25(a)appliedSubstance Misuse
AG ¶ 25(b)appliedTesting Positive for an Illegal Drug
AG ¶ 25(g)appliedExpressed Intent to Continue Drug Involvement
AG ¶ 16(g)appliedAssociation with Persons Involved in Criminal Activity

Key Rule Quoted

“Any doubt concerning personnel being considered for national security eligibility will be resolved in favor of the national security.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedMar 1, 2023
Answer filedMar 15, 2023
Hearing heldJul 10, 2024via MS Teams
Decision dateAug 16, 2024

Cite For

Denial of Security Clearance Due to Ongoing Illegal Drug Use Under Guideline H
Impact of Expressed Intent to Continue Illegal Drug Use on Security Clearance Eligibility
Association with Individuals Involved in Illegal Drug Activities as a Disqualifying Factor Under Guideline E

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline E (Personal Conduct) · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: Decision on RecordDecided: denied

The judge found that the applicant continues to associate with relatives and friends involved in illegal drug use, which raised security concerns. The applicant's association with individuals engaged in criminal activity was deemed a disqualifying factor, leading to a denial of eligibility for access to classified information.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Conduct	Concealed Issue	Response	Disqualifying (¶16)	Mitigating applied (¶17)	Mitigation
2.a	Applicant continues to associate with relatives and friends involved in illegal drug use.	Against Applicant	Association with Persons in Criminal Activity	—	Denied	(g) association with persons involved in criminal activity	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline E). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline H (Drug Involvement) · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: Decision on RecordDecided: denied

The judge found that the applicant has a history of illegal drug use, primarily marijuana, and intends to continue using marijuana in the future. The applicant's drug use was not mitigated, leading to a denial of eligibility for access to classified information.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Substance / event	Use level	Response	Disqualifying (¶25)	Mitigating applied (¶26)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant has a history of illegal drug use, primarily marijuana, and intends to continue using marijuana in the future.	Against Applicant	MarijuanaWHILE CLEARED	Regular	Admitted	(g) expressed intent to continue, or failure to commit to discontinue	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline H). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.