CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 24-00389 — CASE

DOHA Record Explorer

ISCR Case 24-00389

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date11/26/2024
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Related decisionSee the appeal decision (Case 24-00389) →
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Edward W. Loughran
Government Counsel: Jeff A. Nagel
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 55-year-old employee of a defense contractor who had previously held a security clearance for over 20 years. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing security concerns under Guidelines E (personal conduct), F (financial considerations), and J (criminal conduct). The core allegations included unresolved financial debts related to a foreclosed home and a history of domestic violence incidents involving his wife.
During the proceedings, the applicant admitted to having financial difficulties stemming from a foreclosure on a home he purchased in 2006, which he attributed to his divorce and his wife's failure to contribute to the mortgage payments. He denied responsibility for the debts, claiming that the lenders mishandled the loans. Regarding the criminal conduct allegations, the applicant acknowledged some involvement in domestic disputes but maintained that his actions were in self-defense. He provided explanations for several police incidents, including claims of his wife's intoxication and mental health issues.
The administrative judge ruled against the applicant, concluding that he did not sufficiently mitigate the security concerns. The judge found that the applicant's financial issues and the pattern of domestic violence incidents raised significant doubts about his judgment and reliability, which are critical factors in determining eligibility for access to classified information.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline EPersonal Conduct · Against Applicant
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · Against Applicant
- Guideline JCriminal Conduct · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 24-00389

deniedNov 26, 2024· Hon. Edward W. Loughran· hearing

Summary

A 55-year-old defense contractor was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guidelines E (Personal Conduct), F (Financial Considerations), and J (Criminal Conduct). The denial stemmed from a history of questionable judgment, financial irresponsibility, and criminal behavior, including domestic violence and resisting arrest.

Specifically, the applicant was alleged to have failed to satisfy debts and meet financial obligations, indicating poor self-control. He was also arrested for aggravated assault and domestic violence, raising concerns about his judgment and reliability. Furthermore, the applicant exhibited questionable judgment and a lack of candor regarding his conduct, which raised doubts about his trustworthiness.

The judge found the applicant's testimony not credible, which undermined his claims of rehabilitation. Ultimately, the applicant failed to mitigate the security concerns related to his financial and criminal conduct, leading to the denial of his security clearance.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant failed to mitigate security concerns under Guidelines E, F, and J.
The applicant exhibited questionable judgment and a lack of responsibility for his financial and criminal conduct.
The judge found the applicant's testimony not credible, undermining his claims of rehabilitation.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(a)appliedInability to Satisfy Debts
AG ¶ 31(b)appliedEvidence of Criminal Conduct
AG ¶ 16(e)appliedPersonal Conduct Creating Vulnerability to Exploitation

Key Rule Quoted

“Any doubt concerning personnel being considered for national security eligibility will be resolved in favor of the national security.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedMar 19, 2024
Answer filedMay 16, 2024
Hearing heldJul 10, 2024
Decision dateNov 26, 2024

Cite For

Denial of Security Clearance Due to Criminal Conduct Under Guideline J
Failure to Mitigate Financial Irresponsibility Under Guideline F
Questionable Judgment Impacting Personal Conduct Under Guideline E

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline E (Personal Conduct) · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: Decision on RecordDecided: denied

The judge found that the applicant exhibited questionable judgment and lack of candor regarding his conduct, which raised concerns about his trustworthiness. The allegations were ruled against the applicant, leading to a denied security clearance.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Conduct	Concealed Issue	Response	Disqualifying (¶16)	Mitigating applied (¶17)	Mitigation
3.a	Applicant exhibited questionable judgment and lack of candor regarding his conduct, which raises concerns about his trustworthiness.	Against Applicant	Questionable Judgment General	—	Denied	—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline E). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: Decision on RecordDecided: denied

The judge found that the applicant failed to satisfy debts and meet financial obligations, indicating poor self-control and lack of judgment. As a result, the allegations under Guideline F were ruled against the applicant, leading to a denied security clearance.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant failed to satisfy debts and meet financial obligations, indicating poor self-control and lack of judgment. $80,362	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline J (Criminal Conduct) · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: Decision on RecordDecided: denied

The judge found against the applicant on allegations of aggravated assault and domestic violence, determining that the applicant's conduct raised significant security concerns regarding his judgment and reliability. The applicant was convicted of felony charges related to these incidents, leading to a denial of his security clearance.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Offense	Criminal disposition	Response	Disqualifying (¶31)	Mitigating applied (¶32)	Mitigation
2.a	Applicant was arrested for aggravated assault and domestic violence, raising concerns about his judgment and reliability.	Against Applicant	Domestic Violence	Convicted	Admitted	(a) pattern of minor offenses casting doubt on judgment/reliability (b) evidence of criminal conduct, regardless of charge or conviction	—	—
2.b	specific text not stated in this decision	Against Applicant	Unspecified Criminal Conduct	—	Unknown	—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline J). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.