CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 23-02891 — CASE

DOHA Record Explorer

ISCR Case 23-02891

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date2/25/2025
Statusgranted
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Related decisionSee the appeal decision (Case ISCR Case No. 23-02891) →
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Wilford H. Ross
Government Counsel: Aubrey M. De Angelis
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 41-year-old software engineer employed by a defense contractor, seeking a security clearance. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons citing security concerns under Guidelines H (Drug Involvement and Substance Misuse), J (Criminal Conduct), and E (Personal Conduct). The core allegations included the applicant's history of illegal drug use and extensive criminal conduct, which raised doubts about his judgment and reliability.
The applicant admitted to a history of drug use, including marijuana, methamphetamine, and opioids, spanning from 1995 to 2023, and acknowledged multiple arrests and convictions for various offenses, including burglary and drug possession. However, he asserted that he had turned his life around since 2012, after a significant period of incarceration, and had not engaged in drug use since March 2023. He provided evidence of personal growth, including successful completion of education, therapy, and community service, which he argued demonstrated his rehabilitation and commitment to a law-abiding life.
The administrative judge ruled in favor of the applicant, granting him eligibility for access to classified information. The judge found that the applicant had successfully mitigated the security concerns by demonstrating a significant transformation in his life, supported by credible testimony and documentation from professionals attesting to his character and stability. The judge emphasized the applicant's proactive steps toward rehabilitation and his current positive contributions to society.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline EPersonal Conduct · For Applicant
- Guideline HDrug Involvement & Substance Misuse · For Applicant
- Guideline JCriminal Conduct · For Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 23-02891

grantedFeb 25, 2025· Hon. Wilford H. Ross· hearing

Summary

A 41-year-old software engineer was granted a security clearance despite initial concerns under Guidelines E (Personal Conduct), H (Drug Involvement), and J (Criminal Conduct). These concerns stemmed from a history of drug use and criminal behavior. Specifically, the applicant admitted to consistent marijuana use from January 1995 through March 2023, methamphetamine use from January 1999 to August 2012, and opioid use from March 2007 to August 2012.

His criminal history included an arrest in July 2012 for possession of a loaded firearm and methamphetamine, and an altercation with a co-worker in January 2020, four years after his release from prison.

However, the applicant successfully demonstrated significant rehabilitation and positive lifestyle changes. He ceased all illegal drug use in March 2023 and credibly committed to future abstinence. The applicant also showed a substantial life transformation since 2012, marked by educational achievements and stable employment. Positive endorsements from his employer and community members further supported his rehabilitation, leading to the granting of his security clearance.

Why the Applicant Prevailed

The applicant stopped using illegal drugs in 2023 and expressed a credible intent to abstain from future use.
He demonstrated a significant transformation in his life since 2012, including education and stable employment.
The applicant received positive endorsements from his employer and community members, highlighting his rehabilitation.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 25(a)raisedSubstance Misuse
AG ¶ 31(b)raisedEvidence of Criminal Conduct
AG ¶ 31(d)raisedViolation of Parole or Probation

Mitigating

AG ¶ 26(a)appliedBehavior Unlikely to Recur
AG ¶ 26(b)appliedAcknowledgment and Evidence of Overcoming Drug Involvement
AG ¶ 32(a)appliedTime Elapsed Since Criminal Behavior
AG ¶ 32(d)appliedEvidence of Successful Rehabilitation
AG ¶ 17(c)appliedBehavior Unlikely to Recur
AG ¶ 17(d)appliedAcknowledgment and Counseling for Behavior

Key Rule Quoted

“The administrative judge’s overarching adjudicative goal is a fair, impartial, and commonsense decision.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedFeb 16, 2024
Answer filedFeb 26, 2024
Hearing heldJun 5, 2024
Decision dateFeb 25, 2025

Cite For

Successful Rehabilitation After a History of Drug Use and Criminal Conduct
Mitigating Factors Under Guidelines H, J, and E
The Importance of Community Support in Security Clearance Cases

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline E (Personal Conduct) · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: granted

The judge found that the applicant engaged in activities that involved questionable judgment and lack of candor, but ultimately ruled in favor of the applicant. The decision to grant eligibility for access to classified information was based on the applicant's significant personal improvements and rehabilitation efforts.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Conduct	Concealed Issue	Response	Disqualifying (¶16)	Mitigating applied (¶17)	Mitigation
3.a	This allegation states that the information set forth under Paragraph 1, above, is cognizable under this paragraph.	For Applicant	Questionable Judgment General	—	Admitted	—	—	—
3.b	This allegation states that the information set forth under Paragraph 2, above, is cognizable under this paragraph.	For Applicant	Questionable Judgment General	—	Admitted	—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline E). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline H (Drug Involvement) · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: granted

The judge found that the applicant had a history of drug use, including marijuana, methamphetamine, and opioids, but noted significant personal reform and a credible intent to abstain from future use. Ultimately, the judge ruled in favor of the applicant, granting eligibility for a security clearance.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Substance / event	Use level	Response	Disqualifying (¶25)	Mitigating applied (¶26)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant admitted that he used marijuana on a fairly consistent basis from approximately January 1995 through March 2023.	For Applicant	Marijuana	Regular	Admitted	—	—	—
1.b	Applicant admitted that he used methamphetamine from about January 1999 until August 2012.	For Applicant	Methamphetamine	Regular	Admitted	—	—	—
1.c	Applicant admitted that he used opioids from about March 2007 to about August 2012.	For Applicant	Prescription Opioid Misuse	Regular	Admitted	—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline H). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline J (Criminal Conduct) · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: granted

The judge found in favor of the applicant regarding the criminal conduct allegations. The applicant demonstrated significant personal growth and rehabilitation, leading to a decision to grant security clearance despite past criminal behavior.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Offense	Criminal disposition	Response	Disqualifying (¶31)	Mitigating applied (¶32)	Mitigation
2.a	In January 2020, four years after his release from prison, Applicant got in an altercation with a co-worker.	For Applicant	Assault or Battery	Charged Not Convicted	Admitted	—	—	—
2.b	In July 2012, Applicant was arrested and charged with possession of a loaded firearm and possession of methamphetamine.	For Applicant	Drug Related Criminal Charge	Convicted	Admitted	—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline J). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.