Summary
A 33-year-old information technology specialist was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The applicant's financial history included a bankruptcy filing due to excessive debt and a repossessed co-signed vehicle. She also had 23 delinquent or charged-off debts, including medical debts of $100, $440, and $201, and telecommunications debts of $1,317 and $1,178. Additionally, she owed $4,249 from two vehicle repossessions in 2008, a $731 credit card debt, and a $669 debt from a cell phone account opened for a cousin.
While the applicant paid a $141 utility debt as part of a debt consolidation plan, she had not made payments on most of her outstanding debts, and some were not included in her payment plan. Her personal conduct issues included multiple job terminations for reasons such as falling asleep at work and allegations of substance abuse.
The judge found that the applicant had not made sufficient progress in resolving her financial problems. Despite some efforts to mitigate her financial issues, the judge determined that these efforts were inadequate, leading to the denial of her eligibility for access to classified information.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant did not make sufficient progress resolving her financial problems.
- The applicant's financial issues included 23 delinquent or charged-off debts and a bankruptcy.
- The applicant's personal conduct included terminations from multiple jobs due to various issues, including falling asleep at work and allegations of substance abuse.
Conditions Referenced
- F1raisedInability or Unwillingness to Satisfy Debts
- F3raisedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
- E2raisedPersonal Conduct That Raises Questions About an Individual's Reliability, Trustworthiness, and Ability to Protect Classified Information
- F2rejectedThe Conditions That Led to the Financial Problems Were Temporary and Have Been ResolvedThe applicant did not demonstrate sufficient resolution of her financial issues.
- E3rejectedThe Applicant Has Taken Steps to Address Her Financial IssuesThe applicant's efforts were deemed insufficient to mitigate the concerns.
Key Rule Quoted
“Eligibility for a security clearance is predicated upon meeting the criteria contained in the adjudicative guidelines (AG).”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedNov 14, 2012
- Answer filedDec 12, 2012
- Hearing heldApr 18, 2013via video teleconference
- Decision dateMay 16, 2013
Cite For
- Insufficient Progress in Resolving Financial Issues Under Guideline F
- Impact of Personal Conduct on Security Clearance Eligibility Under Guideline E
- Criteria for Evaluating Financial Considerations in Security Clearance Cases.