Summary
A 38-year-old production planning specialist employed by a defense contractor was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The denial stemmed from unresolved delinquent debts totaling $2,511.00 and the applicant's failure to disclose a significant debt on his security clearance application.
Specifically, the applicant had several outstanding debts, including a $236.00 healthcare bill from 1999, a $1,782.00 credit card balance from 1997, a $213.00 credit account balance from 2001, a $302.00 credit account balance from 2002, and a $214.00 credit account balance from 2002, all of which were transferred to debt collectors and remained unresolved in the record. While a $96.00 county court obligation was satisfied and a $1,681.00 credit card debt was settled for $986.62, the judge found that the applicant failed to mitigate four of the seven delinquent debts.
Furthermore, the applicant answered "no" to question 38 on his security clearance application and did not disclose the delinquent debts, including the largest outstanding debt of $1,782.00. A personal financial statement provided by the applicant showed a monthly balance of $24.00 after expenses, with no allowance to pay any of the delinquent debts listed in the Statement of Reasons. The judge concluded that the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to mitigate the financial concerns, leading to the denial of his clearance.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- Applicant failed to mitigate four of the seven delinquent debts addressed by the SOR.
- The applicant's personal financial statement showed no allowance to pay any of the delinquent debts.
- The applicant did not disclose the largest debt of $1,782.00 on his security clearance application.
Conditions Referenced
- E2.A5.1.2.2appliedDeliberate Omission, Concealment, or Falsification of Relevant and Material Facts
- E2.A6.1.2.1appliedHistory of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
- E2.A6.1.2.3appliedInability or Unwillingness to Satisfy Debts
- E2.A6.1.3.3rejectedConditions That Resulted in the Behavior Were Largely Beyond the Person's ControlThe applicant's brief period of unemployment was insufficient to explain the extent of unresolved debts.
- E2.A6.1.3.6appliedIndividual Initiated a Good-faith Effort to Repay Overdue Creditors or Otherwise Resolve DebtsThe applicant settled one debt but failed to address others.
Key Rule Quoted
“"No one has a 'right' to a security clearance."”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedAug 25, 2003
- Answer filedOct 24, 2003
- Hearing heldApr 30, 2004
- Decision dateMar 31, 2005
Cite For
- Failure to Disclose Significant Debts on Security Clearance Applications Under Guideline E
- Financial Irresponsibility as a Disqualifying Condition Under Guideline F
- Insufficient Mitigation of Delinquent Debts Affecting Security Clearance Eligibility