Summary
This case concerns a 36-year-old single mother and recovering alcoholic who was granted a security clearance despite initial concerns under Guidelines E (Personal Conduct), G (Alcohol Consumption), H (Drug Involvement), and J (Criminal Conduct). The Statement of Reasons highlighted a history of alcohol consumption, including a 1991 DUI arrest and other alcohol-related incidents, leading to treatment for abuse. Additionally, the applicant initially failed to fully disclose past drug use on her SF 86 and during interviews.
However, the applicant demonstrated significant rehabilitation. She has not used drugs since 1995 and has maintained sobriety from alcohol since 1999, actively participating in Alcoholics Anonymous. The judge noted her commitment to rehabilitation and community service, earning high regard from peers and co-workers.
Ultimately, the judge found that the applicant mitigated the security concerns. There was no intent to mislead the government regarding her past drug use disclosures, and her sustained sobriety and active involvement in Alcoholics Anonymous were key factors. Consequently, the security clearance was granted.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- The applicant has maintained sobriety since 1995 and has been actively involved in Alcoholics Anonymous.
- The applicant demonstrated a commitment to rehabilitation and community service, earning high regard from peers and co-workers.
- The judge found no intent to mislead the government regarding the applicant's past drug use disclosures.
Conditions Referenced
- DC 1raisedAlcohol Consumption
- DC 2raisedPersonal Conduct
- DC 3raisedPersonal Conduct
- DC 1raisedIllegal Drug Use
- MC 2appliedAlcohol Consumption
- MC 3appliedAlcohol Consumption
- MC 1appliedIllegal Drug Use
- MC 3appliedPersonal Conduct
Key Rule Quoted
“A fair and commonsense assessment of the record before me, which reflects a person who has not only overcome her past problems but has gone on to thrive in every way imaginable, mitigates the government's concerns about Applicant's ability to protect classified information and to exercise the requisite good judgment and discretion expected of one in whom the government entrusts its interests.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedOct 21, 2003
- Answer filedDec 1, 2003
- Hearing heldSep 14, 2004Applicant presented nine exhibits and five witnesses.
- Decision dateJan 31, 2005
Cite For
- Mitigation of Security Concerns Related to Past Substance Abuse Under Guideline G and H
- Demonstration of Rehabilitation and Community Involvement as Factors in Granting Security Clearance
- Lack of Intent to Mislead in Disclosures Related to Personal Conduct Under Guideline E