Skip to content
← The Issue Encyclopedia

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline J · Criminal Conduct

Homicide

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.

Does homicide affect a security clearance?

Homicide is an issue decided under Guideline J, Criminal Conduct. In the decided DOHA record it appears in 57 hearing-level cases, and 18% of the 57 decided ended with access granted (10 granted, 47 denied). The mitigating conditions judges credited most often, and example decisions either way, are below.

Basis: 57 decided hearing-level cases raising this issue. Descriptive history of decided cases, not a prediction.

More questions people ask the record

Decided cases

57

hearing-level decisions raising this issue

Granted

18%

10 granted · 47 denied or revoked

Official mitigating conditions cited

The formal mitigating conditions the case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted and in cases that were denied. Each is shown with its paragraph number and a plain name. Read what each condition says.
  • ¶ 32(a) · So much time has passed, or the circumstances were so unusual

    In granted cases
    9
    In denied cases
    9
  • ¶ 32(d) · Successful rehabilitation shown

    In granted cases
    6
    In denied cases
    6
  • ¶ 32(b) · The person acted under pressure that is unlikely to recur

    In granted cases
    4
    In denied cases
    3
  • ¶ 32(c) · No reliable evidence that the person committed the offense

    In granted cases
    2
    In denied cases
    5

Circumstances credited in granted cases

The specific circumstances the judge expressly credited among the granted cases on this issue where that detail was extracted.
  • passage of time · credited in 1 granted case
  • rehabilitation evidence · credited in 1 granted case

Recent decided examples

  • The judge found that the applicant mitigated the trustworthiness concerns regarding criminal conduct. The applicant's eligibility to occupy a public trust position was granted, despite a prior convict…

  • The judge found that the allegations under Guideline E were withdrawn, resulting in no findings against the applicant. Therefore, the personal conduct concerns were not substantiated, and the applican…

  • Applicant, a defense contractor employee, was denied eligibility for a security clearance after the judge found against him on Guideline J and Guideline E. The record showed juvenile attempted murder,…

  • Applicant, a 55 year old IT technician, was denied a security clearance after the judge found a long history of serious criminal conduct, including drug trafficking, weapons offenses, and a 16 year fe…

See all 57 decisions on this issue

Related issues under Guideline J

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose per-allegation profile records this issue, matched to the same issue value the search filters use, so a count here and a filtered search always agree. A case raising several issues counts under each one. The mitigating conditions and the credited circumstances below were extracted for a subset of the record, so both are counts of cases rather than rates. Pages exist only for issues with at least 25 decided cases, and † marks any split built on fewer than 20.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.