Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline M · IT Systems
Pornography / Inappropriate Content on an Employer System
What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.
Decided cases
61
verified hearing-level decisions
Granted
23%
14 granted · 47 denied or revoked
Official mitigating conditions cited
The formal mitigating conditions (by official paragraph) that case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted vs denied. Extracted for a subset of cases; counts are numbers of cases, not rates. Read what each condition says.
| Condition | In granted cases | In denied cases |
|---|---|---|
| ¶ 41(a) | 8 | 3 |
Recent decided examples
- ISCR 18-00557 granted · 2020The applicant in this case was a 45-year-old information technology support specialist who sought a security clearance to work in the defense industry. The Department of Defense (DoD) issued a Stateme…
- ISCR 19-02492 granted · 2022Applicant in this case was a 51-year-old U.S. citizen who had worked overseas for various Department of Defense (DOD) contractors and held a security clearance since 1991. The Department of Defense is…
- ISCR 16-03472 denied · 2018The applicant in this case was a 50-year-old senior engineer who sought a security clearance after being employed by various defense contractors. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reason…
- ISCR 17-02144 denied · 2019The applicant in this case was a 50-year-old information technology professional who had held a security clearance since 2006. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing secu…
Related issues under Guideline M
- Unauthorized Use of an IT System · 100 cases
- Unspecified IT Misuse · 91 cases
- Unauthorized Access / Entry into an IT System · 44 cases
- Unauthorized Modification, Destruction, or Denial of Access · 40 cases
- Unauthorized Hardware, Software, or Media · 35 cases
For questions about how this issue has been treated on particular facts, the assistant searches the record, and the CASE Prep service provides a written, human-reviewed response. Descriptive research only: not legal advice or a prediction.