Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline M · IT Systems
Unauthorized Hardware, Software, or Media
What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, never a prediction.
Decided cases
34
verified hearing-level decisions
Granted
24%
8 granted · 26 denied or revoked
Official mitigating conditions in play
The formal mitigating conditions (by official paragraph) that case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted vs denied. Extracted for a subset of cases; counts are cases, not percentages of everything. Read what each condition says.
| Condition | In granted cases | In denied cases |
|---|---|---|
| ¶ 41(a) | 3 | 2 |
Recent decided examples
- ISCR 19-02686 granted · 2020The applicant in this case was a 56-year-old cyber-security analyst employed by a defense contractor since March 2018. He faced security concerns under Guidelines M (Use of Information Technology) and…
- ISCR 22-02395 granted · 2025The applicant in this case was a 32-year-old cyber security specialist employed by a defense contractor since May 2019, seeking a security clearance. The Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agenc…
- ISCR 17-02612 denied · 2019the conduct; (4) the presence or absence of rehabilitation or other permanent behavioral changes; (5) the motivation for the conduct; (6) the potential for pressure, coercion, or duress; (7) the likel…
- ISCR 18-02284 denied · 2019The applicant in this case was a 61-year-old employee of a defense contractor who sought to retain his security clearance. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons citing concerns under…
Related issues under Guideline M
- Unauthorized Use of an IT System · 99 cases
- Unspecified IT Misuse · 92 cases
- Pornography / Inappropriate Content on an Employer System · 61 cases
- Unauthorized Access / Entry into an IT System · 44 cases
- Unauthorized Modification, Destruction, or Denial of Access · 40 cases
Wondering how this issue plays against your own facts? Ask the assistant, or get a written, human-reviewed response through Answers. Descriptive research only: not legal advice or a prediction.