Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline M · IT Systems
Unauthorized Hardware, Software, or Media
What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.
Decided cases
35
verified hearing-level decisions
Granted
23%
8 granted · 27 denied or revoked
Official mitigating conditions cited
The formal mitigating conditions (by official paragraph) that case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted vs denied. Extracted for a subset of cases; counts are numbers of cases, not rates. Read what each condition says.
| Condition | In granted cases | In denied cases |
|---|---|---|
| ¶ 41(a) | 3 | 2 |
Recent decided examples
- ISCR 19-02686 granted · 2020The applicant in this case was a 56-year-old cyber-security analyst employed by a defense contractor since March 2018. He faced security concerns under Guidelines M (Use of Information Technology) and…
- ISCR 22-02395 granted · 2025The applicant in this case was a 32-year-old cyber security specialist employed by a defense contractor since May 2019, seeking a security clearance. The Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agenc…
- ISCR 17-02612 denied · 2019the conduct; (4) the presence or absence of rehabilitation or other permanent behavioral changes; (5) the motivation for the conduct; (6) the potential for pressure, coercion, or duress; (7) the likel…
- ISCR 18-02284 denied · 2019The applicant in this case was a 61-year-old employee of a defense contractor who sought to retain his security clearance. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons citing concerns under…
Related issues under Guideline M
- Unauthorized Use of an IT System · 100 cases
- Unspecified IT Misuse · 91 cases
- Pornography / Inappropriate Content on an Employer System · 61 cases
- Unauthorized Access / Entry into an IT System · 44 cases
- Unauthorized Modification, Destruction, or Denial of Access · 40 cases
For questions about how this issue has been treated on particular facts, the assistant searches the record, and the CASE Prep service provides a written, human-reviewed response. Descriptive research only: not legal advice or a prediction.