Skip to main content

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline M · IT Systems

Unauthorized Access / Entry into an IT System

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, never a prediction.

Decided cases
44
verified hearing-level decisions
Granted
41%
18 granted · 26 denied or revoked

Official mitigating conditions in play

The formal mitigating conditions (by official paragraph) that case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted vs denied. Extracted for a subset of cases; counts are cases, not percentages of everything. Read what each condition says.

ConditionIn granted casesIn denied cases
¶ 41(a)101
¶ 41(b)61

Recent decided examples

  • ISCR 18-00557 granted · 2020
    The applicant in this case was a 45-year-old information technology support specialist who sought a security clearance to work in the defense industry. The Department of Defense (DoD) issued a Stateme
  • ISCR 19-02686 granted · 2020
    The applicant in this case was a 56-year-old cyber-security analyst employed by a defense contractor since March 2018. He faced security concerns under Guidelines M (Use of Information Technology) and
  • ISCR 19-01138 denied · 2019
    The applicant in this case was a 40-year-old employee of a defense contractor who sought to retain his security clearance. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons citing concerns under
  • ISCR 20-01562 denied · 2021
    The applicant in this case was a 35-year-old individual who had worked for various defense contractors since 2004 and had been granted a security clearance in 2006. The Defense Counterintelligence and

See all 44 decisions on this issue →

Wondering how this issue plays against your own facts? Ask the assistant, or get a written, human-reviewed response through Answers. Descriptive research only: not legal advice or a prediction.