Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline M · IT Systems
Unauthorized Access / Entry into an IT System
What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, never a prediction.
Decided cases
44
verified hearing-level decisions
Granted
41%
18 granted · 26 denied or revoked
Official mitigating conditions in play
The formal mitigating conditions (by official paragraph) that case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted vs denied. Extracted for a subset of cases; counts are cases, not percentages of everything. Read what each condition says.
| Condition | In granted cases | In denied cases |
|---|---|---|
| ¶ 41(a) | 10 | 1 |
| ¶ 41(b) | 6 | 1 |
Recent decided examples
- ISCR 18-00557 granted · 2020The applicant in this case was a 45-year-old information technology support specialist who sought a security clearance to work in the defense industry. The Department of Defense (DoD) issued a Stateme…
- ISCR 19-02686 granted · 2020The applicant in this case was a 56-year-old cyber-security analyst employed by a defense contractor since March 2018. He faced security concerns under Guidelines M (Use of Information Technology) and…
- ISCR 19-01138 denied · 2019The applicant in this case was a 40-year-old employee of a defense contractor who sought to retain his security clearance. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons citing concerns under…
- ISCR 20-01562 denied · 2021The applicant in this case was a 35-year-old individual who had worked for various defense contractors since 2004 and had been granted a security clearance in 2006. The Defense Counterintelligence and…
Related issues under Guideline M
- Unauthorized Use of an IT System · 99 cases
- Unspecified IT Misuse · 92 cases
- Pornography / Inappropriate Content on an Employer System · 61 cases
- Unauthorized Modification, Destruction, or Denial of Access · 40 cases
- Unauthorized Hardware, Software, or Media · 34 cases
Wondering how this issue plays against your own facts? Ask the assistant, or get a written, human-reviewed response through Answers. Descriptive research only: not legal advice or a prediction.