Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline M · IT Systems
Unauthorized Modification, Destruction, or Denial of Access
What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, never a prediction.
Decided cases
40
verified hearing-level decisions
Granted
20%
8 granted · 32 denied or revoked
Official mitigating conditions in play
The formal mitigating conditions (by official paragraph) that case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted vs denied. Extracted for a subset of cases; counts are cases, not percentages of everything. Read what each condition says.
| Condition | In granted cases | In denied cases |
|---|---|---|
| ¶ 41(a) | 5 | 2 |
Recent decided examples
- ISCR 18-00557 granted · 2020The applicant in this case was a 45-year-old information technology support specialist who sought a security clearance to work in the defense industry. The Department of Defense (DoD) issued a Stateme…
- ISCR 19-03928 granted · 2022The applicant in this case was a 41-year-old director of engineering employed by a defense contractor since 2003, seeking to reinstate his security clearance to enhance his position. The Defense Count…
- ISCR 17-02998 denied · 2019The applicant in this case was a 57-year-old employee seeking to retain his security clearance in the defense industry, having previously held a clearance during military service. The Department of De…
- ISCR 19-01585 denied · 2021The applicant in this case was a 40-year-old individual with a bachelor's and master's degree, who had been employed by a federal contractor since July 2016. The Department of Defense issued a Stateme…
Related issues under Guideline M
- Unauthorized Use of an IT System · 99 cases
- Unspecified IT Misuse · 92 cases
- Pornography / Inappropriate Content on an Employer System · 61 cases
- Unauthorized Access / Entry into an IT System · 44 cases
- Unauthorized Hardware, Software, or Media · 34 cases
Wondering how this issue plays against your own facts? Ask the assistant, or get a written, human-reviewed response through Answers. Descriptive research only: not legal advice or a prediction.