Skip to content
← The Issue Encyclopedia

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline E · Personal Conduct

Violation of a Written Commitment

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.

Does violation of a written commitment affect a security clearance?

Violation of a Written Commitment is an issue decided under Guideline E, Personal Conduct. In the decided DOHA record it appears in 44 hearing-level cases, and 9% of the 44 decided ended with access granted (4 granted, 40 denied). The mitigating conditions judges credited most often, and example decisions either way, are below.

Basis: 44 decided hearing-level cases raising this issue. Descriptive history of decided cases, not a prediction.

More questions people ask the record

Decided cases

44

hearing-level decisions raising this issue

Granted

9%

4 granted · 40 denied or revoked

Circumstances credited in granted cases

The specific circumstances the judge expressly credited among the granted cases on this issue where that detail was extracted.
  • acknowledgment and remorse · credited in 1 granted case

Recent decided examples

  • The judge found that the applicant's personal conduct did not raise security concerns. The applicant's past drug use was deemed infrequent and unlikely to recur, and he demonstrated a commitment to ab…

  • The judge found that the applicant mitigated the personal conduct concerns arising from a breach of his employment agreement with his former employer. This incident was characterized as a minor lapse …

  • The applicant in this case was a 40-year-old senior logistics specialist who had held a security clearance since 2003. The Department of Defense's Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA…

  • The applicant in this case was a 67-year-old employee of a government contractor, who had a history of personal conduct issues that raised security concerns under Guideline E. The Statement of Reasons…

See all 44 decisions on this issue

Related issues under Guideline E

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose per-allegation profile records this issue, matched to the same issue value the search filters use, so a count here and a filtered search always agree. A case raising several issues counts under each one. The mitigating conditions and the credited circumstances below were extracted for a subset of the record, so both are counts of cases rather than rates. Pages exist only for issues with at least 25 decided cases, and † marks any split built on fewer than 20.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.